Sexy Billboard Ban Declared Unconstitutional

ST. LOUIS — A federal appeals court has struck down a two-year-old law banning sexually suggestive billboards along Missouri highways.

Calling the ban an unconstitutional regulation of commercial speech, a three-judge panel for the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with a consortium of adult retail stores and strip clubs that joined forces to sue state Attorney General Jay Nixon from enforcing the law.

Passions Video, the Lion’s Den and 10 John Haltom-owned stores brought suit against the state along with a Kansas City strip club owned by Gala Entertainment.

According to the ruling, the law failed because it was not “narrowly drawn” to meet its stated goals of reducing the possibly negative effects that sexually suggestive billboards could pose, including harming minors, reducing traffic safety and dropping property values.

The state “failed to make a showing that more limited speech regulation would not have adequately served the state’s interest,” the panel said.

The law would have required advertisers using sexually explicit material on their billboards to phase out the offensive ads by mid-2007. Eventually, under the law, adult retail stores and strip clubs would be allowed only two highway signs — one showing the business’ name and operating hours, the other saying the adult-oriented business is off-limits to minor.

The ruling overturns a U.S. District Court ruling from earlier this year, which upheld the law as constitutional.

State Sen. Matt Bartle pushed the legislation, which he modeled after a similar New Jersey statute. The New Jersey Supreme Court upheld that statute.

According to AP reports, the state has not said whether it will file an appeal to the court’s ruling.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FSC Releases Updated Age-Verification Toolkit

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced the release of its updated age verification toolkit.

UK Moving Ahead with Plan to Outlaw 'Choking' Content

The U.K. government has announced its intent to follow through on criminalizing “choking” content, a plan that was announced earlier this year.

Italy to Require Age Verification for Adult Sites

Italian media regulator AGCOM has announced that all sites and platforms hosting adult content will be required to implement age verification systems starting Nov. 12 to prevent access by users under 18.

Russian Lawmakers Call for Age Verification

Two Russian lawmakers have called on the country’s government to implement age verification for adult content.

Canadian Privacy Commissioner Endorses National AV Bill

Philippe Dufresne, privacy commissioner of Canada, has voiced support for a bill that would impose fines of up to $500,000 on adult sites that do not implement age verification for Canadian viewers.

Industry Attorney Paul Cambria Retires After 50 Years of Practicing Law

After more than a half-century in practice, during which he provided the defense in some of the adult industry's most notable legal cases, attorney Paul Cambria has retired.

FSC: California's Device-Based AV Law Does Not Apply to Adult

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) put out an advisory today explaining that California's new device-based age verification law does not apply to adult websites.

Ohio AG Threatens Action Against 'Major' Adult Sites Over AV Law

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost announced today that his office is sending "notice of violation" letters to 19 adult websites for failure to comply with the state's recently enacted age verification law.

Ukrainian Content Creators on Hook for Nearly $10M in Back Taxes

Content creators in Ukraine owe the equivalent of $9.3 million in back taxes, according to the country's State Tax Service.

Updated: European Patent Office Board of Appeals Revokes EIS GmbH Patent

The European Patent Office (EPO) Board of Appeals last week ruled in favor of pleasure brand LELO in the company's ongoing dispute with Satisfyer parent company EIS GmbH.

Show More